Adaptive Extensions of a Two-Stage Group Sequential Procedure for Testing a Primary and a Secondary Endpoint (I): Unknown Correlation Between the Endpoints
نویسندگان
چکیده
Tamhane, Mehta and Liu [1] studied a two-stage group sequential procedure (GSP) for testing a primary and a secondary endpoint where the primary endpoint serves as a gatekeeper for the secondary endpoint. They assumed a simple setup of a bivariate normal distribution for the two endpoints with the correlation coefficient ρ between them being either an unknown nuisance parameter or a known constant. Under the former assumption they used the least favorable value of ρ = 1 to compute the critical boundaries of a conservative GSP. Under the latter assumption they computed the critical boundaries of an exact GSP. However, neither assumption is very practical. The ρ = 1 assumption is too conservative resulting in loss of power, while the known ρ assumption is never true in practice. In this Part I of a two-part paper on adaptive extensions of this two-stage procedure (Part II deals with sample size re-estimation), we propose an intermediate approach that uses the sample correlation coefficient r from the first stage data to adaptively adjust the secondary boundary after accounting for the sampling error in r via an upper confidence limit on ρ by using a method due to Berger and Boos [2]. We show via simulation that this approach achieves 5%-11% absolute secondary power gain for ρ ≤ 0.5. The preferred boundary combination in terms of high primary as well as secondary power is O’Brien and Fleming [3] for the primary and Pocock [4] for the secondary. The proposed approach using this boundary combination achieves 72%-84% relative secondary power gain (with respect to the exact GSP that assumes known ρ). A clinical trial example is given to illustrate the proposed procedure. Copyright c ⃝ 0000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
منابع مشابه
Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (II): sample size re-estimation.
In this part II of the paper on adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure (GSP) for testing primary and secondary endpoints, we focus on the second stage sample size re-estimation based on the first stage data. First, we show that if we use the Cui-Huang-Wang statistics at the second stage, then we can use the same primary and secondary boundaries as for the original procedu...
متن کاملAdaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
In a previous paper we studied a two-stage group sequential procedure (GSP) for testing primary and secondary endpoints where the primary endpoint serves as a gatekeeper for the secondary endpoint. We assumed a simple setup of a bivariate normal distribution for the two endpoints with the correlation coefficient ρ between them being either an unknown nuisance parameter or a known constant. Unde...
متن کاملTesting a primary and a secondary endpoint in a group sequential design.
We consider a clinical trial with a primary and a secondary endpoint where the secondary endpoint is tested only if the primary endpoint is significant. The trial uses a group sequential procedure with two stages. The familywise error rate (FWER) of falsely concluding significance on either endpoint is to be controlled at a nominal level α. The type I error rate for the primary endpoint is cont...
متن کاملAdaptive designs for clinical trials with multiple endpoints
Rationale for adaptive designs with multiple endpoints In clinical trials, the efficacy of a new treatment is usually assessed by a single primary endpoint [1,2]. Other important aspects concerning the new treatment, such as adverse events or quality of life, are taken into account by the definition of secondary endpoints. Usually, only the primary endpoint is analyzed confirmatorily with a sta...
متن کاملSome controversial multiple testing problems in regulatory applications.
Multiple testing problems in regulatory applications are often more challenging than the problems of handling a set of mathematical symbols representing multiple null hypotheses under testing. In the union-intersection setting, it is important to define a family of null hypotheses relevant to the clinical questions at issue. The distinction between primary endpoint and secondary endpoint needs ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012